In the current financial and  economic climate many people have suffered at the hands of their bank.  Many feel aggrieved at the way their bank has treated them. There are  many groups which are a focus of concern at the  way banks behave and there is no shortage of forums which allow bank  customers to voice their dissatisfaction at bad bank behavior.
 Despite all the bluster, all  the focus groups and all the blogs, ultimately the answer to your  problem on the day will boil down to who is right and who is wrong  according to the law. And there is the beginning of a problem.
 Despite the fact that we have  centuries of law which generally favours our institutions and banks in  particular, the law and Judges are increasingly prepared to accept that  banks behave badly and there is now more likelihood  that a court will find in favour of the customer than ever before. This  is a not a wholesale change in the legal landscape but it is at least a  moderate change in prevailing climate.
 In order to make the most of  your chances you need a lawyer who can best exploit the law, the  procedural rules and the prevailing ‘climate’.
 Large law firms together will  account for most of the legal expertise in the banking field. Those  same law firms will always derive significant income from acting for  banks. Often it is expressly agreed between an individual  bank and a law firm that if the law firm agrees to act for the bank  then it will decline to act against not only that bank but clearing  banks as a whole.
 This does make sense from the  bank’s perspective but severely limits the pool of expertise that you  can draw on in fighting the bank.
 I deal with banking disputes  for clients who are not banks. Often banks have behaved badly towards a  business and push it over the edge because they know that they have the  comfort of a personal guarantee. So it becomes  your problem and not theirs. We cannot always waive a magic wand and  sometimes the bank does in fact have the upper hand according to the  law. However this is certainly not always the case, far from it, and I  have selected a team of people that can assist  you, based to the following criteria :
 1.     Established expertise
 2.     Knowledge of the inside workings of banks
 3.     Knowledge of banking documentation
 4.     No conflicts of interest. In other  words, no-one acts regularly for banks in general or any particular bank  and is not therefore conflicted in acting against banks.
 Therefore we like to think  that we can offer the same expertise when acting against banks that they  have routinely available in making claims against you. 
Email me: patrick.selley@keystonelaw.co.uk


No comments:
Post a Comment